Nepal, Bhutan & Tibet

SOME OF THE HISTORICAL FACTS ABOUT BHUTAN AND BHUTANESE. Dr. Bhampa Rai

SOME OF THE HISTORICAL FACTS ABOUT BHUTAN AND BHUTANESE

 

KING Accepts:

In his foreword to the revised edition of ‘BHUTAN”, a book first published in 1972 and written by Nagendra Singh, one time Constitutional Advisor to the Royal Government of Bhutan from 1970 until his election as a judge of the International Court of Justice in 1972, King Jigme Singye Wangchuk of Bhutan has evidently accepted that today’s Bhutan was a tutelage of Kamarupa, Assam (India), until 650 A.D and the northern Bhutanese including the present dynasty migrated to Bhutan from Tibet. So the ruling elite ofBhutanare as much migrants as any other communities that make up the Bhutanese nation, and they are no more or less threatened out of extinction as any other ethnic groups.

 

IMMIGRANTS FROM TIBET

After the death of Bhaskaraverma, the ruler of Kamarupa, the tutelage of Kamarupa, today’s Bhutan, got separated from Kamarupa only to expose itself to incursions from  Tibet which swept the country in about 861-900 A.D (“BHUTAN’ by Nagendra Singh 1978:18.) Prior to this, there were no Tibetans (Bhuteas) in today’s Bhutan. Those Tibetans who swarmed Bhutanliked it so much they refused to return to Tibetand such deserters were called “Milog”. More influx followed from Tibetand these immigrants began settling in today’s Bhutanwithout any edict from Indian rulers who were ruling this area until 8th century. Those immigrants were mainly attracted by better ECONOMIC conditions of this Indian ruled area.

 

OUSTING INDIAN RULERS

Later, these migrants succeeded in gradually ousting the Indian rulers and their subjects and today no descendants of the Indian rulers are present inBhutanwho, by virtue of their being original inhabitants, could have labelled all migrants toBhutanas ‘illegal immigrants”. However, we have a situation where descendants of earlier immigrants with the reins of State power labeling the descendants of later immigrants as economic and illegal migrants and evicting them from their motherland,Bhutan, to become refugees. What an irony?

 

 

 

 

IMMIGRATION OF TIBETAN LAMAS

Historical evidence suggests that since 13th century AD onwards, some prominent lamas like Gyalwa Lanangpa, Phago Drugom Shigpo, longchhenpa Drime Ozer, Barawa Gyaltshen Passang, Kuenga Pajo etc. from Tibet started immigrating to today’s Bhutan and started ruling this area with each lama holding sway over small principalities. Later in 17th century AD, all those territories were united by a monk named Zhabdrung Nawanag Namgyal, who immigrated to this area in 1616 AD from Ralung inTibet. He ruled this unified nation under a theocratic system which in many ways still persist inBhutan through “Driglam Namza” but under internationally more acceptable guise of “Unique Democracy”.

 

MONARCHY AND WAYS OF RULING IN BHUTAN

Although the system of monarchy in Bhutanwas established in 1907, the ruling system persisted as that of medieval theocracy and the people were subjected to arbitrary rule and their existence was painful and difficult.  In this difficult situation, the people from southern Bhutan defied the authorities and dared to form a political party called “Jai Gorkha” under the guidance of late Sahabir Rai to address their grievances against discrimination and oppression and organized a mass peaceful rally at Dagana, Bhutan, in 1947. This party was brutally crushed down by the regime with the help of India by killing Mahasur Chhetry, one of the leaders from Chirang, Bhutan and high premium was put on the head of late Sahabir Rai.  Following this, another Political Party “Bhutan State Congress” under the presidentship of Late D. B. Gurung was formed in 4th November 1952 to address the same grievance as that of advanced “Jai Gorkha”.

 

FIRST TIME CITIZENSHIP IN BHUTAN

Because of the protest of those two political parties, the then rulers of Bhutanwere forced to re-think their policies and hence, promulgated laws for the first time to grant citizenship to all Bhutanese domiciled in Bhutanon or before 31st December 1958 through a resolution of the National Assembly (No. 3, 11th session, 1958 and No.8, 11th session, 1958). And the census record was maintained by the village heads called Mandals until 1968 when the Ministry of Home Affairs of Bhutan was established.

 

 

REGIME’S ETHNIC CLEANSING MOVE

All Bhutanese, irrespective of their regional or ethnic affiliations, lived in peace and harmony. And they all contributed equally to the nation building process until late 1980s.  But the rulers ofBhutanshook them out of their blissful life when they began implementing discriminatory and suppressive policies and conducting irrational census exercises only in southernBhutanin 1988 targeting only the Bhutanese of Gorkha/Nepalese ethnicity. With strong inbuilt intention of ethnic cleansing, this illogical census forcefully disqualified many bona-fide Bhutanese citizens of Gorkha/Nepalese ethnicity and labeled them as ECONOMIC MIGRANTS. Such discriminatory policy of the rulers was resented by the bona-fide Bhutanese and they organized mass peaceful rallies in southernBhutanin 1990 and in easternBhutanin 1997 to express their grievances. Both the rallies were brutally crushed down by the regime which instantly labeled those demonstrators as ANTI-NATIONAL and TERRORIST.  And later they were labeled as ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS to make their propaganda sound more imposing and realistic. Surprisingly, such dirty propaganda of the Bhutanese rulers seems to suit the powers with vested interest to see the plight of the Bhutanese refugees continue.

 

DECEPTIVE PROPAGANDA OF REGIME

In the mid 90s, when the international pressure onBhutanvis-a-vis the refugee issue grew stronger, the rulers ofBhutanaccepted the truth of its bona-fide citizens living as refugees in easternNepal. It proposed to categorize and verify them before taking them back toBhutan. But when time actually came to take the verified ones toBhutan, the ever cunning tyrant rulers ofBhutanprevaricated and successfully diverted world attention from the real issue of finding a solution to the refugee problem with their self-serving slogan of “Gross National Happiness”

 

It is a matter of great regret and shame that the international community and many democratically elected leaders who have made civil liberty and human rights their plank are found supporting gimmick of doubtful worth of autocratic tyrant Bhutanese rulers at the cost of fundamental rights of the Bhutanese citizens including respect for Human Rights in Bhutan.

 

 

 

 

GROSS NATIONAL HAPPINESS IN BHUTAN ??

When speaking about “Gross National Happiness” in Bhutan, however, it is very important to know whether the present rulers of Bhutanwho evicted about 1/6th of their citizens from the south and the east are still happy inBhutan.  And if indeed they believe so, they must at the least accept themselves to be barbaric rulers of the medieval period rulingBhutan under a theocracy through Driglam Namza. If they are not, coming up with such slogan of Gross National Happiness is shameful and violating their conscience..

 

We ask how rational and conscious Bhutanese can live happily inBhutan:

 

–              when more than one lakh of their fellow countrymen were evicted from their motherland to become refugees just for raising voice against discrimination, oppression and human rights violation inBhutan;

–              when they are not allowed to meet their evicted relatives by the rulers ofBhutan  even on tragic occasion like the death of their relatives;

–              when the landed properties of their evicted relatives is distributed mostly to the northerners;

–              when the land of southern Bhutanese, still living in Bhutan is tactically  declared excess by the land surveyors and allotted to the  northern Bhutanese with inborn intention of creating misunderstanding between northern and southern Bhutanese and ultimately displacing Bhutanese of Nepalese  ethnicity;

–              when vast area of northernBhutan, about ten thousand square kilometers is surrendered toChinaafter confiscating vast lands of evicted bona-fide southern Bhutanese;

–              when tyrant Bhutanese rulers sign treaty withIndiato pile up plenty of arms and ammunition just to subdue the genuine voices of the Bhutanese citizens at present and in future;

–              when once the Bhutanese rulers proposed to sacrifice one of the southern districts  to………? after resettling all bona-fide Bhutanese of Nepalese  ethnicity  in that particular district. (Bhutanese refugees inNepalby Prof. Mahendra P. Lama, June 2007:22 );

–              when their motherland, Bhutanis mortgaged only for the welfare and security of the tyrant rulers;

–              when many Bhutanese still living insideBhutanexpress their desire to resettle in third countries

–              when no Bhutanese have right to raise voice against the existing human rights violation, particularly after 1990 and when the rulers are working against the bonafide Bhutanese and nation, Bhutan.

Without tackling the pre-existing and structurally fostered gross human rights violation inBhutanand addressing the Bhutanese refugee issue, the catchy and attractive slogan like “Gross National Happiness” is to lull the gullible outside and cover up one crime of the Bhutanese rulers with another crime.

 

NATIONALISTIC BHUTANESE

That the Bhutanese rulers lacked in nationalistic feeling have been well manifested from the past when the then rulers of Bhutan handed over vast tract of Bhutanese land from the east bank of river Teesta (in India) to the west bank of river Jaldhaka (in Bhutan) along with 18 (eighteen) Duars to British India in 1865 just to save themselves and remain in power.  Recently about 10 thousand square kilometers along the northern boundary is surrendered to the Chinese so the present rulers continue their tyrannical. rule under the cover unique democracy.  Even in 2007, the rulers of Bhutan thought to cede one of the southern districts of Bhutan after resettling all bona-fide Bhutanese of Gorkhas/Nepalese ethnicity in that particular district. Such attitude of Bhutanese rulers clearly reflects their nationalistic feelings and demonstrates their love for the country. Hence, rulers ofBhutancoming up with slogans like “Gross National Happiness” inBhutanare nothing but great deception, particularly toBhutanand to all nationalistic Bhutanese. We are very sure their deception will be exposed before long in future.

 

In contrast, the Bhutanese from the south and the east have more ardent nationalistic feelings observed by their strong determination to stay back inBhutandespite discrimination, oppression and their gross Human Rights violations by the regime. Even the evicted Bhutanese proved their strong nationalistic feelings by living in horrendous refugee camps situations and awaiting repatriation to their motherland,Bhutan.

 

No law and religion has ever said that a country belongs only to the rulers of the particular country. It belongs as much also to the citizens who live in that country. So evicting the children of a particular nation by the people in the power is a grievous crime. And in the same breath one may say that the citizens of any nation easily forgetting their nation and giving away their nationality are committing the biggest sin. So, all the children ofBhutan, resettled anywhere in the world are constantly reminded not to forget their motherland,Bhutanand work hard to return with honour and dignity.

 

Dr. Bhampa Rai,

chairperson

Bhutanese refugees representative repatration commette œ BRRRC _.

Leave a Reply